![]() That would be detraction: "He becomes guilty. Petrus said: "If one decides to abandon one's spouse, and break up the family they are the ones who need to defend their actions." He certainly does not need to defend his actions to the public. ![]() ![]() Divorce is tolerated by the Church under certain circumstances: "If civil divorce remains the only possible way of ensuring certain legal rights, the care of the children, or the protection of inheritance, it can be tolerated and does not constitute a moral offense." (CCC #2383) of RASH JUDGMENT who, even tacitly, assumes as true, without sufficient foundation, the moral fault of a neighbor." Please share the "sufficient foundation" you have to presume that her husband did not have a legitimate reason to leave. A so-called 'husband' who would abandon her? What kind of a husband is that?" Why do you presume that her husband did not have a legitimate reason to leave? What evidence do you have that he had no legitimate reason to leave? The Catechism clearly states: "He becomes guilty. I'm simply commenting on her victim mentality, as if she did nothing wrong. but ask any mother." Of course it is sad. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |